|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: West Palm Beach, Florida, Bans Firearms Sales and Public Carry
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Mayor Keith James put the order into place after the city had seen protests and public demonstrations on Sunday, May 31, that were deemed as “civil unrest” when confrontations with law enforcement developed in the evening. Several fires were reported, as well as damage to stores.
Obvious questions arise from the order. First, how is any of this constitutional? And what good is the Second Amendment – which the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled is grounded in the concept of self-defense – if it can be infringed specifically when the need for defensive action may be especially acute? |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/4/2020)
|
It's true that this mayor invoked emergency powers under state law, which prohibits the sale of firearms and ammunition as well as carrying firearms in public for the duration of the declared state of emergency. It also prohibits confiscation, which is no small consolation.
Once that law is invoked those provisions are automatic, not discretionary. Painting those prohibitions as arbitrary by omission is just short of dishonest, and unworthy of the NRA.
The problem is with that statute, regardless of the political affiliation of the civil officer invoking it. It is facially unconstitutional.
Marion Hammer should jump on this like a cat on a junebug, and raise hell until the state legislature addresses it. |
| Comment by:
jimobxpelham
(6/4/2020)
|
| WHAT PART OF THE CONSTITUTION DOES HE NOT UNDERSTAND, SECOND ADMENDMENT SAYS IN VERY EASILY UNDERSTOOD SHALL NOT INFRINGE, WHAT A DOLT, |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
