|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jdege
(12/27/2017)
|
| I'll consider using a handgun that depends upon batteries when we have batteries that have a 0.00001% failure rate after 30 years in a shoebox under the bed. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/27/2017)
|
| Once this camel's nose gets under the tent flap, plan on sleeping with a camel. |
| Comment by:
jac
(12/27/2017)
|
Nobody wants these. The military doesn't want them. Police don't want them. Sportsmen don't want them. People that concealed carry don't want them.
The only people that want them are the flaming liberals that don't buy guns anyway.
There is no market for "smart" guns and anyone attempting to manufacture them will go out of business. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
