|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
PA: Crisis In The Supreme Court
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The U. S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has taken on enormous and disturbing super-legislative powers undercutting voter rights, crushing labor protections, and undermining much needed environmental safeguards. Soon they will decide our health care. In the face of a climate crisis and our failing democracy, shifting legislative functions to an unelected, unaccountable body is a perilous step. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/29/2020)
|
Wadda laugh.
This guy's whining is almost humorous. It is the liberal 'living constitution' judges that invent things out of whole cloth, who legislate from the bench.
But this assclown does the typical 'progressive' thing - accuses the right of the sins of the left.
What we have now is a SCOTUS that will stick to the Constitution and interpret the laws as written.
That isn't a crisis, it is redemption. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
