|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WA: The sheriffs resisting Washington's new gun laws: 'I'm not going to enforce that'
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In Washington state, a freshly implemented ballot initiative and a raft of new bills may produce some of the tightest firearms regulations in the US. But standing in the way is a group of rural law enforcement officers who say point blank that they won’t enforce any of it.
The Klickitat county sheriff, Bob Songer, is one of them. He told the Guardian that the initiative passed last November “is unconstitutional on several grounds. I’ve taken the position that as an elected official, I am not going to enforce that law”. |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(1/26/2019)
|
Any order that is contrary to the Constitution of the U.S. or of the State, or to a Constitutional law, is illegal. Compliance with such an order is probably not only "NOT" required by law enforcement, but may be, and probably is illegal, and the issuance of such an order to knowingly deprive law abiding citizens of their rights is a crime, which should obligate law enforcement to investigate, and eventually arrest Oath breaking servants that are conspiring to do so....Honor that Oath...
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/27/2019)
|
| WA sheriffs to state zeitgeist and ignorant 1639 voters: " *PLTHBPLTHBPLTHBPLTHBPLTHBPLTHBP!* [inhale] NYA-NYA!!! " |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
