|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Critics of no-guns-on-base rule say U.S. soldiers are ‘sitting ducks’
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Last week’s shootings at two military facilities in Chattanooga, Tenn., have some questioning why military personnel on U.S. bases aren’t allowed to carry weapons for self-defense.
Gunman Mohammad Abdulazeez killed four marines and one sailor at a military recruiting center and a Navy operations office Thursday. Authorities said Abdulazeez did not appear to have ties to international terror groups. Police responding to the shooting eventually killed him. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(7/23/2015)
|
anti-gun (D)'s >>> blood on their hands>>>Juan Williams ("The Five"), a self appointed spokesman who rails against arming them after this
navytimes.com/story/military/2015/07/21/sources-navy-officer-marine-shot-chattanooga-gunman/30426817/
Navy officer & Marine fired sidearms at Muhammad Abdulazeez, the gunman who murdered five service members in Chattanooga
"So, is the President of the United States going to oversee the prosecution of military personnel who defended themselves against the Chattanooga Jihadi using weapons they were not allowed to carry? When the rules get to this level of stupid, not allowing service members to protect themselves, that good military members have to break them, what does that say about those in charge?" |
| Comment by:
-none-
(7/24/2015)
|
navytimes.com/story/military/crime/2015/07/23/unarmed-troops-scrambled-to-get-away-from-chattanooga-gunman/30585411/
Unarmed troops scrambled to get away from Chattanooga gunman
July 23, 2015
describing a chaotic scene of mostly unarmed Marines scrambling to escape the man who approached with an assault rifle, a handgun and a vest full of extra ammunition. Five didn't make it.
Marines ran from room-to-room, trying to get their fellow service members to safety.
As Abdulazeez made his way through the reserve center he "continued to shoot those he encountered,"
The whole thing ended just a few minutes after it began, as police caught up to Abdulazeez, shooting and killing him — but not before he managed to wound one of them. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(7/24/2015)
|
"It's also unclear why they were armed, as it is against Defense Department policy for anyone other than military police or law enforcement to carry weapons on federal property."
"A report distributed among senior Navy leaders during the shooting's aftermath said Lt. Cmdr. Timothy White, the support center's commanding officer, used his personal firearm to engage Abdulazeez"
translation: "unclear why they would risk court martial, dishonorable discharge and federal charges" to do their job, safeguarding/protecting the junior ranking men under their command.....
***A LIEUTENANT COMMANDER NO LESS***
literally, the support center's CO.......uh......because he has (the largest share of) the duty to safeguard his troops..... |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people; or of peaceable assemblies by them, for any purposes whatsoever, and in any number, whenever they may see occasion. —ST. GEORGE TUCKER'S BLACKSTONE |
|
|
