
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
New Zealand to Add Gun Restrictions; ‘No Place for Radical Gun Lobby’
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
While New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced there will be new gun control laws within ten days because of the mosque attacks last Friday that left 50 people dead, the head of the New Zealand Police Association has declared that gun advocates should not have a voice in the process.
It’s a scenario that gun prohibitionists in the United States would welcome, but for that pesky Bill of Rights. The First Amendment protects the right of firearms advocates to speak, and the Second Amendment protects the right to have firearms, while also protecting the First, say rights activists. |
Comment by:
Stripeseven
(3/19/2019)
|
There you go.. Let's blame everyone that didn't have anything to do with this tragedy. |
Comment by:
stevelync
(3/19/2019)
|
That's what happens when a nation of betas elect split-tails to rule over them. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|