|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
VT: Talking civilly about 'Guns in Our Community'
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Ann Braden, the leader of Gun Sense Vermont, said she started her grassroots advocacy group to try.
As a society we have a responsibility to look at what laws are on the books and how they are being enforced, Braden said. Its important to recognize how many gun owners are responsible and take safety seriously. My organization is focused on the small fraction of people that most agree should not have access to guns.
Gun Sense Vermont is seeking universal background checks in hopes of keeping violent felons from buying firearms. |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(10/9/2016)
|
| Universal background checks would not keep criminals from having guns, just as outlawing drugs hasn't stopped addiction. Keeping so called 'non violent drug users' imprisoned would help. Enforced prosecution of those who (legitimately) fail present background checks would help. Getting Eddie Eagle into your local K-3 school would help. Real consequences for the tiny immoral criminal population that abuse guns would help. Universal background checks, no. They would only infringe on the lawful responsible gun owner. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
