|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
dasing
(6/5/2017)
|
They are hard things to bear, but still do not give her a mandate to the removal of everyones rights! |
Comment by:
mickey
(6/5/2017)
|
A woman with a family history of deadly mental illness declares the rest of us unfit to possess the tools necessary for self defense. Crazy, eh? |
Comment by:
jac
(6/5/2017)
|
Guns may have been the instrument of their death, but it was not the cause.
It seems to me that this misguided woman should find a worth while cause to support instead of railing against the rights of law abiding citizens. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|