|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(8/29/2016)
|
| It is amazing that otherwise rational people can be so stupid. The probability of being injured or killed in an automobile accident is probably 100 times greater than being shot by a person with a concealed carry license. Maybe even 1000 times greater. |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(8/29/2016)
|
| What these fool cannot seem to wrap their tiny little minds around is the simple fact that they have always been at risk from concealed weapons. All that stupid no carry rule did was disarm those inclined to obey the law. Those with harmful intent, not so much. |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(8/29/2016)
|
| Which causes more folks to stay away from campus; "gun free zone" signs or law abiding productive individuals who are intelligent enough to carry self-defense weaponry? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
