|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
OK: Oklahoma Senate Passes, Governor Signs Permitless Carry Bill
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signed his first bill Wednesday afternoon: House Bill 2597, which will let Oklahomans carry guns without a permit.
"As I traveled all over the state, to all 77 counties, I heard from Oklahomans all over that they wanted us to protect their right to bear arms," Stitt said.
The full Senate approved HB2597 on a 40–6 vote earlier Wednesday afternoon. It does not apply only to handguns.
"You will be able to carry any type of firearm as long as it’s in some type of a holster or a sling. You cannot brandish a long firearm," said Sen. Kim David in response to a question on the Senate floor. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/28/2019)
|
[inhale] NYA NYEH' NYA NYEH' NYA-NYA!!! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|