|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Businesses Should Allow Guns
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In Wisconsin, it is legal with the proper licensing and training to carry a concealed weapon. People are now able to hide their guns but still carry them on their person. This helps a lot of people feel safer when they are going out in public. However, a lot of places started prohibiting guns on their premises after this law went into effect. This now prohibits people from exercising their right to have their guns on them to help them feel safe when they are out in public. This is not right. |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(10/26/2016)
|
| Perhaps if the politicians could push pause on their pandering and pass liability laws to discourage law suits against businesses in case a customer or employee uses a weapon for self defense. State guidelines to train folks that carry might help. Hmmm, maybe a little too practical for our politicos. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
