|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/23/2017)
|
| First he says "keep the laws that work", and then he gives a list of laws that don't work and says we need to keep them... |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/23/2017)
|
I don't know what article you were reading, Mickey.
Here's what he actually said:
Magazine Capacity Restrictions: "Let’s get rid of this failed law."
Outlaw Semi-Automatic Weapons: "Gun prohibition failed to disarm criminals, so let’s get rid of it."
Prohibit Private Citizens from Owning Firearms: "Prohibition fails, so let’s get rid of it."
We need more gun-free zones: "Since murderers like them, let’s get rid of gun free zones."
And finally: "[I] want to get rid of these gun control laws that don’t work." |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/23/2017)
|
Phorto, that would be the article I skimmed.
When I saw 'Demand Universal Background Checks' as the first point, I pretty much stopped reading, so I missed him tearing that demand down, not making it. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
