
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Covering Up Good Guys With Guns
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
How far will the so-called “mainstream” media go to cover up times when a good guy with a gun stops a bad guy with a gun? A recent incident in which an armed citizen stopped a mass shooting at a South Carolina nightclub has answered that question for us. Here’s the story. A number of patrons of a nightclub in Lyman, S.C., were standing outside the club early last Sunday morning when a man got into an argument with another man. According to deputies with the Spartanburg County Sheriff’s Office, the man pulled out a gun and began firing into the crowd, hitting three people. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/6/2016)
|
Yo. Snopes.
It wasn't a "mass shooting" BECAUSE the good guy shot the perpetrator BEFORE it BECAME one.
YOU. FRIGGIN'. IDIOTS. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|