|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NC: Feeling homicidal? OK, here have a gun
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
This time, they are stark, raving, barking, howling mad. And they may be in charge. “They” would be the legislators who appear driven to make the Second Amendment superior to all our other rights. They would not even interfere with the “right” of a dangerously mentally ill person to have unfettered access to guns and ammunition. And they would block that person’s medical providers from tipping off the cops if their patient is about to explode. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(5/9/2015)
|
Obviously Mr. White has joined the "shrinking minority" of hoplophobic ranters willing to mindlessly iterate
demonstrably false syllogisms ad infinitum. "Silencer" ? Really, Mr. White. The correct term is "suppressor", or "attenuator". "Silencer" is pure advertising hyperbole by Mr. Maxim perpetuated by hollywood plot fantasies. And individuals' purchase/possession is controlled by the ATFE. As are all firearms purchases from licensed retailers after receiving certification of fitness to possess from the same government agency.
One wonders if Mr. White would be equally accepting of similar restrictions upon his purchase of personal computers/modems or internet access. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
