|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/10/2019)
|
"More guns in the schools."? There are NO guns in the vast majority of schools, you idiots, except infrequently in the hands of loony toon shooters, which you CANNOT prevent. You can train those who are authorized to carry. You CAN'T stop loony toons, except at the point of their attack.
Opposition is irrational. The bottom line is that unless there are people immediately present to take down an active shooter, kids will be injured and killed. There simply is no argument that can negate that reality.
Nobody wants to force people to be armed and trained to stand duty. But instead of being obstinate and blindered, these numbskulls should stand aside and let those who are willing, do so. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
