|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Abusing Government Watch Lists: How Freedom Dies
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
By now, you’ve heard and read about the schemes proposed by everyone from President Barack Obama to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., that would ban firearms sales to anyone on the so-called “Terror Watch List.”
And as you probably already know, Republican leaders—and some, but not enough, Democrats—oppose this reckless and dangerous policy, because it violates:
--the principle of due process under the law, a foundation of American jurisprudence;
--the notion of “innocent until proven guilty;”
--the right to hear any charges and confront any witnesses against you;
--the right to an open trial by a jury of your peers; and
--the very rule of law upon which this nation was founded. |
| Comment by:
jac
(12/31/2015)
|
What could possibly be a problem with a secret government list that infringes on one's rights? The government won't tell you if you are on the list, why you are on the list, who put you on the list and there is no avenue open to get off the list.
You can bet that if this proposal ever became law, your NRA membership, and a lot of other conservative memberships will get you added to the list.
All one needs to look at is the IRS' treatment of conservatives.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
