|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Actually, Joe Biden, Flamethrowers Are Legal In All 50 States
Submitted by:
jack burton
Website: https://myhightechsecurity.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Almost all the candidates running in the Democratic Party primary are currently not running to become president of the United States, but of the internet. This is causing them to scramble leftward across each other in an attempt to win the Twitter primary.
Front-runner Joe Biden, despite leading with the majority that doesn’t live online, is as susceptible as the rest. Given the renewed discussion about gun control, he had this to say on Thursday: “It violates no one’s Second Amendment rights to say you can’t own certain weapons. You’re not allowed to own a bazooka; you can’t own a flamethrower.” |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(8/15/2019)
|
"It violates no one's second amendment rights to say you can't own certain weapons."
WRONG.
What do you think "shall not be infringed" means? "Infringe:" 1.) To intrude into, or onto. 2.) To diminish source: OXFORD AMERICAN DICTIONARY
"SHALL" Is an imperative. It does not say "may," it says SHALL. Consult a lawyer and ask what is the difference between using those words in a contract or legal document.
But then, Biden has always been a clueless gaff machine. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
You are bound to meet misfortune if you are unarmed because, among other reasons, people despise you....There is simply no comparison between a man who is armed and one who is not. It is unreasonable to expect that an armed man should obey one who is unarmed, or that an unarmed man should remain safe and secure when his servants are armed. In the latter case, there will be suspicion on the one hand and contempt on the other, making cooperation impossible. — Niccolo Machiavelli in "The Prince." |
|
|