|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
From One Proud Gun Owner to Others: It’s Time to Reinstate the Assault Weapons Ban
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In the aftermath of the worst mass shooting in U.S. history in Las Vegas this past week, I’ve been struck by the clear resignation of a society faced with an increased threat of the violence that comes from more mass shootings. Like so many other parents of young children, I’ve long worried that If gun control legislation couldn’t be moved forward by the Sandy Hook tragedy, then the massacre of dozens of country music fans on the Las Vegas strip certainly isn’t going to move the needle on gun safety either. |
Comment by:
dasing
(10/6/2017)
|
Not all firearm owners believe in our Republic , but without it they would NOT OWN FIREARMS!!!! |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/6/2017)
|
Link goes to wrong story. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|