|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(10/22/2019)
|
| We also need to make sure our children are being educated on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence. The children need to understand that voting is not the only thing that they will have. They have rights, and they need to know them.. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/22/2019)
|
Why should I listen to children who have essentially been brainwashed -- often through fear --- into parroting some adult's socialistic babble?
"And a little child shall lead them," will be the reason tauted by the leftwingers, trying to appeal to conservatives who cling to their bibles and guns by quoting Isiah 11:6. (In a incorrect context).
"Foolishness is bound up in the heart of the child," (Proverbs 22:15) will respond those who actually own bibles but are willing to play the same misusing of Scripture to eviscerate their opponents' argument.
O'Rourke remains a fool and a dictator-wannabe....
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/22/2019)
|
| Beto is listening to that mechanical monkey in his brain clapping cymbals together. |
| Comment by:
RichardJCoon
(10/22/2019)
|
| I think Beto has been listening to children too long, or maybe it's the weed. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
