|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
From My Cold Wet Hands: Humorless Scold Targets Squirt Guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
We have yet to reach Memorial Day, but the fun police have already set their sights on at least one cherished summer childhood activity. In an article for Pupsugar.com, titled, “Why Kids Should Never Play With Water Guns. Period.,” author Lauren Levy lectures the nation’s parents on the hidden menace of squirt guns.
According to Levy, no child should be permitted to use a water gun under any circumstances. That a particular squirt gun might bear no resemblance whatsoever to a real firearm is of no concern to Levy, who contends, “Even if they're colorful and super cool, kids shouldn't be playing with water guns because it normalizes the real thing.” |
Comment by:
dasing
(5/20/2017)
|
It does NOT normalize the real "thing". |
Comment by:
netsyscon
(5/20/2017)
|
Another snowflake climbs on their soapbox! Out of the mouths of Libtards. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/20/2017)
|
Yet another bona fide meddlesome, busybody left-wing nutjob. |
Comment by:
shootergdv
(5/21/2017)
|
Probably should have kids eat with their fingers, using plastic knives and forks will probably turn 'em into Jack the Ripper when they grow up... |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|