|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jughead
(7/15/2016)
|
| if so then the 1st only protects pen and paper not printing presses and electronic devices. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(7/15/2016)
|
How about kegs of black powder? They had those.
How about the Girondoni 20 shot repeating rifle?
How about the pepper box?
How about cannons? They had cannons |
| Comment by:
moondog
(7/16/2016)
|
| Even a non lawyer knows that the 1st amendment only covers a single page at a time printing press and not one of those multi page printers nobody needs a multi-page printer and as far as the internet goes that is not covered it all! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
