|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
xqqme
(8/16/2019)
|
I am more cynical... Gun control politicians, being fully aware that the laws on the books haven't worked as promised, and will not work as promise, seek to add more restrictions that (they know) will not work as promised. They do this not to actually create a society where no gun violence exists, but to create a political environment where citizens clamor for supposed safety so loudly that they give up their freedom and become slaves to the almighty Government. History is forgotten: Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, Communist China... all of the reigns of terror and government-directed murder of their citizens are ignored. History may not exactly repeat itself, but it does rhyme, and it has been a grim tale for many. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|