
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: Stop Illegal Anti-Gun Signs In Florida
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Since Florida Carry was formed in 2011 we have been highly successful in having thousands of illegal anti-gun “GunBuster” signs removed at public facilities of state agencies, parks, nature preserves, college/university parking lots, and county/city buildings.
Just today, the Florida Department of Health removed an illegal “No Firearms” sign from its public health facility in Bay County. We were able to have this sign taken down because one of our members took the time to report it to us. |
Comment by:
mickey
(5/30/2015)
|
Did these signs become illegal in Florida, or were they always illegal?
Taxpayers shouldn't have to foot the bill to buy, install, and remove the signs. The jerks who ordered the signs should pay. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|