
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
jac
(12/7/2019)
|
Only works with gun registration.
This is a foot in the door to require all guns be registered. And the gun control faction is well aware that this is only the first step. |
Comment by:
Stripeseven
(12/7/2019)
|
Alrighty then…So let the deprivation of rights begin. Right?.. Wrong.. The Republics Constitution does not give them the unchecked, unchallenged power that they so desire. No one has been given the green light to try and destroy the Bill of Rights. Do what is right, even when no one is watching...Honor the Oath..Serve..not Rule... |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/8/2019)
|
The response is simple: IGNORE THEM.
No one has a duty to obey unconstitutional laws, and the meme that laws aren't unconstitutional until the Supreme Court says they are is ridiculous.
If the SCOTUS rules a law that's been in force for 20 years is unconstitutional, that means that for TWENTY YEARS people have been subjected to an unconstitutional law.
Non sequitur. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|