|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
It’s All Good: A boy’s life with guns, a toll of woodchucks, guns as bonding agents...
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
America’s ammo >> I wrote last week about .223 Remington cartridges, which in hunting loads are essentially dumdums . . . expanding bullets, designed for one-hit knock-downs & appropriate for hunting and self-defense (though a 9 mm. pistol or a shotgun is better against rural home invasion).— Societal challenge: how to keep .223s from scything down like machine-gun fire on urban concert-goers 500 yards away, on school-children & teachers down the hall?—We might consider 5-round magazines for civilian rifles. Pistol magazines are a more complicated matter. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/10/2018)
|
| Lad bink. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
