|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
dasing
(1/16/2017)
|
| If those people are so dangerous, why are still out of jail? |
| Comment by:
jac
(1/16/2017)
|
Another empty headed liberal that believes people should loose their rights because some bureaucrat puts their name on a list without any judicial oversight.
The only way I would support such a restriction would be if the law awarded $1 million dollars in damages to be paid directly by said bureaucrat if the individual was wrongly placed on the list.
There has to be consequences when people are wrongly identified and deprived of constitutional rights. |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(1/16/2017)
|
| Here's a recipe for govt to deny rights as they are won't to do. Lots of ideas that sound good on the surface and not enough due process or even basic enforce of present laws. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
