|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
The Second Amendment is not a blank check to own every weapon imaginable
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Now, let me ask you a question: do you see any items in that list that you don’t want the average US citizen to be able to possess and use for self- and property defense purposes?
If the answer is yes, then congratulations, you have something in common with gun control advocates. You agree that there are some arms which are so dangerous that no citizen should be allowed to possess them. You, like the majority of Americans and the Supreme Court of the United States of America, believe that the Second Amendment is subject to reasonable limitations. The question for you is where to draw the line. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(2/2/2017)
|
| At the time you could own cannon, musket, kegs of black powder. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(2/2/2017)
|
| That is exactly what the 2A is ! |
| Comment by:
dasing
(2/2/2017)
|
| 2A is niether a self defense or property defense, it is a defense of the State against the FED ! |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/2/2017)
|
The Second Amendment IS a blank check to own the following weapons: arms “in common use” that have “some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia” and/or are “any part of the ordinary military equipment” (U.S. v Miller, 1939).
In ruling that defendant Miller’s sawed-off shotgun wasn’t within the ambit of Second Amendment protection, the above criteria were established. “Switchblades” of the front-opening variety were also part of the “ordinary military equipment” issued to paratroopers in WWII and thereafter.
The upshot of that precedent is that military small arms commonly carried by individual foot soldiers are those the bearing of which the Second Amendment was enumerated to protect.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
