|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WI: State Debate: Rep. Bob Gannon's 'Gun Bill' Decried
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Political Heat blogger Chris Walker contends that state Rep. Bob Gannon's gun view relies on the doctrine of "mutual assured destruction." What Gannon and others who think like him are trying to do, Walker asserts, is to shift the blame of gun violence away from guns and onto business people who don't want guns in their establishment. His reasoning isn't rational, the blogger says. |
Comment by:
-none-
(6/27/2016)
|
http://patch.com/oregon/portland/woman-kills-intruder-childs-bedroom
Intruder Killed While in Child's Bedroom Identified as Gresham Man David McCrary was shot and killed by Tara-Alexis Ford when she came home and found him in her daughter's room.
Portland, OR
By Colin Miner (Patch Staff) - June 27, 2016 6:17 pm ET
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|