|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
IL: Taking guns away is unconstitutional
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
My stance is no secret. If someone asks me I’m going to tell them, we all have a right to own guns.
Taking them away is unconstitutional and I prefer not to die due to home invasion of any other situation that involves self deference.
Yes, if you haven’t guessed it already, I am republican.
But my political views have very little to do with my pro-gun opinion.
I think there should be classes you have to take to be able to own a gun or a gun license.
Oh wait, there is, it’s called the Firearm Owners Identification Card, ladies and gentlemen and any sane, law-abiding citizen fills it out, if they want a gun. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(10/30/2015)
|
| Requiring government permission is also unconstitutional to practice a civil, natural, and constitutional right. Oh wait, I see your from Il. Yep, it works so well in Chicago. The rest of us don't have to ask permission in the actual USA. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
