|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
hisself
(2/16/2018)
|
Idiot! An AR-15 is NOT an assault weapon!
Would you be happier if Nikolas had used an old WWII Garand, or a lever-action .30-30? Or any other rifle that wasn't black and mean looking? |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(2/16/2018)
|
Geee, Zach Peters should have conducted a NICS check on the intruders before he shot them! Or atleast asked them if they were good guy criminals or bad guy criminals!
Or at the very least used a shotgun rather than an EVIL BLACK RIFLE, so the bad guys wouldn't be as dead as they wound up being, right?
What twaddle this article is! |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/16/2018)
|
The reason so-called "assault weapons" are legal is that there is case-law precedent protecting the right to keep and bear them (U.S. v. Miller, 1939)
It is the position of the Court that arms "in common use" (like AR-15s) that have "some reasonable relationship to the efficiency...of a well-regulated militia" and/or are "any part of the ordinary military equipment" are precisely those within the ambit of 2A protection.
It is precedent that clearly establishes that the gov't not only can't ban such firearms, but that any regulations on their possession and use must stand "strict scrutiny" to pass muster, and must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling gov't interest and actually accomplish its stated goal. |
| Comment by:
jac
(2/16/2018)
|
"The AR-15 is much more commonly used as an offensive weapon."
Actually these rifles are much more commonly used for shooting at targets, hunting, and sporting events.
This guy's an idiot with an agenda.
The real problem with school shootings are that the schools are victim disarmament zones and no one can respond effectively for the five to 15 minutes it takes the cops to show up.
The killers know that and that is why they choose such venues for their carnage. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(2/17/2018)
|
| If you kill someone with a Ruger 10/22 are they less dead than if you used an AR-15??? Please explain.... |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling in terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? [...] The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!" —Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago (Chapter 1 "Arrest") |
|
|
