|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(9/29/2015)
|
The faculty doesn't make or enforce the law.
Concealed carry is concealed. Carry anyway. Someone needs to get flunked for concealed carry, and then the lawsuits can begin.
By the way, in 1968 at Penn State university, I was flunked in an engineering class when I challenged a professor's anti-gun diatribe in a class, presented my own statistics and challenged him to backup his statistics with references.
I got a 30 % on the first exam where partial credit was given, but I didn't get any partial credit. Reading the writing on the wall, I quit going to class.
I couldn't drop the course without losing my draft deferment so had to take an F.
|
| Comment by:
jac
(9/29/2015)
|
(Con't)
As proof that I should not have been failed, I got an A the same semester in the associated 1 credit lab, taught by a grad student and got an A when I retook the course with a different professor.
Back then the professors had a lot more power and control and one had little recourse. That is changed today with the internet.
Even 47 years ago there were liberal hoplophobic professors with zero integrity that would flunk a student for standing up for his rights.
Let the fun begin. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| You are bound to meet misfortune if you are unarmed because, among other reasons, people despise you....There is simply no comparison between a man who is armed and one who is not. It is unreasonable to expect that an armed man should obey one who is unarmed, or that an unarmed man should remain safe and secure when his servants are armed. In the latter case, there will be suspicion on the one hand and contempt on the other, making cooperation impossible. — Niccolo Machiavelli in "The Prince." |
|
|
