|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
lbauer
(8/1/2018)
|
These students are being told that stricter gun control laws will somehow make them safer. With over 22,000 federal, state, and local gun laws currently on the books that would appear to be a blatant lie. And should they somehow manage to eliminate most if not all of the 400 million firearms estimated to be in private hands, what then? Peace and safety such as we see in Great Britain where their violent crime rate is only five times greater than ours. And cities such as London with a murder rate only slightly higher than New York City. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(8/1/2018)
|
"Foolishness is bound up in the heart of the child." ~~ Proverbs 22:15 |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|