data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdd48/fdd487ee41c9eeffc3a8053b937721c590360eee" alt="Keep and Bear Arms"
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
A new second amendment for our time
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
But guns keep getting more lethal. Today’s AR-15 will eventually be supplanted by guns that shoot faster, are easier to conceal, hold more rounds, and do more damage to the human body. High-powered plastic guns that can’t be caught by metal detectors. Ammo that explodes into mass shrapnel, capable of killing a dozen people with a single round. |
Comment by:
laker1
(6/18/2016)
|
Ammo that explodes and kills a dozen people. You mean like the 12 gauge shotgun shell loaded with buckshot. That old weapon of war still carried by our troops. Maybe the 9mm pistol a weapon of war carried by our troops. These mental midgets are stuck on stupid and would not know which end of a gun is which. If they can ban a black rifle they can ban all guns. They don't like them because they are black and shooty. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/18/2016)
|
Ouch! This hurt my brain to read. Bullets that can kill dozens of people.
And all this time I've been waiting for the invention of the working phaser............. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|