|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: Detroit Coney Island employee shoots, kills armed robber
Submitted by:
Corey Salo
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"A worker at a Detroit Coney Island shot and killed a robber Sunday morning after the man walked into the restaurant with a gun and announced a robbery in front of customers."
"Police say the robber was an adult man who was attempting to rob the Pete's Grill and Coney Island at 1400 East Outer Drive on the city's east side."
"'Next thing I know, I saw everybody getting down on the ground,' said Robert Felton, of Detroit, who was inside the restaurant during the robbery. 'This guy was robbing the place. He had the gun on everybody. He was telling everybody, 'get to the register, I want the register.'"
"The employee shot the man, killing him." ... |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/22/2015)
|
"Detroit homicide detectives are still investigating to make sure the evidence matches a self-defense shooting."
The shooting was Sunday morning. It's Monday. You have 20 eyewitnesses with unanimous confirmation as to the events.
WHY are you still 'investigating'? |
Comment by:
teebonicus
(6/22/2015)
|
"Detroit homicide detectives are still investigating to make sure the evidence matches a self-defense shooting."
The shooting happened on Sunday morning. It's now Monday. You have 20 eyewitnesses with unanimous confirmation of the events.
WHY are you still 'investigating'? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|