|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: Gun Control Is Not A “Women’s Issue” As Senator Gillibrand Claims
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
“This debate is relegated to the men. It’s about hunting? It has nothing to do with hunting,” Gillibrand explained on Thrush’s podcast. “Nothing in this debate has to do with hunting, and nothing in this debate has to do with the Second Amendment rights. Nothing… I think – I see the world in the lens of women’s issues. I’m making everything a woman’s issue. I want guns to be a woman’s issue.”
Yes, you heard that right. If you’re a man and you have a firearm, then you should have little to no say in what happens with gun-related legislation. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(4/23/2016)
|
"If you’re a man and you have a firearm, then you should have little to no say in what happens with gun-related legislation." ~~ Senator Gillabrand.
Huh? What?!?! I can have a gun, but I have no say in gun related legislation?
Is this the kind of Totalitarian Fascist cr@pol@ we're going to have to tolerate in the next few years???
I'm buying more ammo .... again.
7.62x51 and 5.56mm., if you want to know .... |
| Comment by:
dasing
(4/23/2016)
|
| She can't see beyond her own sex! |
| Comment by:
jac
(4/24/2016)
|
| Half of her brain was blown away. What would you expect from someone with only half a brain? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
