|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Talk is Cheap, President Trump
Submitted by:
Rob Morse
Website: https://slowfacts.wordpress.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
President Donald Trump spoke at the National Rifle Association annual meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. He said he would defend the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Maybe he will, and maybe he won’t. Talk is cheap, Mister President. Show us.
Mr. President, prosecute the federal agents who broke the law.
Mr. President, protect the innocent citizens who are arrested as they travel from state to state.
Mr. President, defend all of our rights.
Here is the hard truth. Politicians would rather leave our rights in jeopardy so they can raise campaign fund before the next election. No more. Time is running out for both the President and the Republican majority we elected. It is time to act. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(5/5/2017)
|
https://www.facebook.com/aworldatwar/videos/10156053864734008/
SOCIALISM OR ELSE! The Venezuelan government is literally running over protesters in order to stop them from toppling the socialist government that liberals in Europe and the USA were praising just a year ago. This is exactly what everyone who knows even a little history was warning liberals around the world would happen, and look, now there's a brutal dictator running over his own citizens who protest him. They all say "but we'll do it differently"... yet it always ends the same. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
