|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/1/2018)
|
Oh, yes, we all need a law like that! One of my dearest friends lost his battle with alcoholism by hanging himself because he couldn't get his hands on a gun.
"Well, little girl, would'ja rather they jumped outta windas?" - Archie Bunker
Feel-good law that doesn't solve the problem. |
Comment by:
jac
(10/1/2018)
|
If she was committed to psychiatric hospitals she should have been prohibited from buying a gun. Sounds like the system that liberals want to expand failed once again.
Furthermore, anyone that is intent on committing suicide will do so with or without a gun.
The problem with no gun registries is that the liberals will keep expanding it to preclude gun ownership for any number of reasons. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|