
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MO: Democratic lawmakers Set Sights on a Missouri Where Kids Don't Find and Shoot Loaded Guns
Submitted by:
David Willliamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Democratic lawmakers will again try to criminalize firearms storage that allows children to find guns and potentially hurt themselves or others. In the Missouri House, St. Louis County Rep. Stacey Newman told the News-Leader she'll be re-filing a version of her previous bill that would make it a Class D felony to knowingly leave "a readily available, loaded deadly weapon" in the presence of anybody younger than 17. To meet Newman's standard for security, gun owners would either have to put a trigger or cable lock on their weapon, remove the ammunition or put the firearm in a safe.
|
Comment by:
Sosalty
(12/6/2016)
|
Mandates before educating gun owners to how they can make gun ownership safer? Don't cry "commonsense" to me, it's primarily about harassing gun owners. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|