|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
I don't Want My Family's Guns Around My Kids
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
As a lawyer, I have the deepest respect for the Second Amendment and an individual's right to bear arms. But as I parent, I feel strongly about my right to keep my children out of situations where firearms are present. This bright-line rule served me well, until last month when I learned that my parents and other extended family members had recently obtained handguns and concealed-carry permits. |
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(12/22/2015)
|
| Typical Lawyer Talks out of both sides of his mouth |
| Comment by:
jac
(12/22/2015)
|
"Knowing how to check a gun's safety to determine if it was loaded made me feel a tiny bit more comfortable around firearms"
Ignorant democrat. A gun's safety has nothing to do with whether it is loaded.
The smart position would be to teach her children gun safety, something she's obviously incapable of, but can be done by someone else. Instead she elects to limit the grandparents' contace with her children. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
