|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
LA: Woman fatally shot man who had gone into her home in Treme and punched her, officials say
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The slain man was named William Jones, and the woman who killed him has not been accused of a crime, authorities said, as they released additional details Thursday about the case.
According to police, the woman was trying to leave her driveway in the 700 block of North Miro Street about 7 a.m. when Jones blocked her in. Jones then followed his estranged wife as she ran into her home, punching her numerous times.
The woman ultimately pulled out a handgun and fired it three times at Jones, striking him. Paramedics later arrived and brought him to the hospital, but he was pronounced dead there, police said. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(6/22/2018)
|
| But...but...we need to disarm women like her to protect them from domestic violence... |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
