|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NH: Encourage companies to stop selling automatic weapons
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Today our schools have an even graver responsibility, to protect their students from the violence of a mass shooter. Teachers are taught to direct their students to get under their desk; supposedly this action would protect them from a weapon of war? Why are these weapons even sold to the ordinary citizen?
For the first time in several years, the government has passed laws that touch on protecting our students but it is not enough. Parents are outraged that automatic weapons are readily available. The writers of the Second Amendment certainly never meant for any citizen to own weapons such as these. |
| Comment by:
jimobxpelham
(8/27/2022)
|
| THIS WOULD BE FUNNY IF IT WASNT SO BLATENTLY FALSE, NO REASEARCH HAS BEEN DONE HERE IN THIS ARTICLE, CHECK OUT THE NFA OF 1934. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
