|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
mickey
(9/18/2015)
|
Name a prominent politician of the Bush family who is pro-gun. Just one, name him.
Can't do it, can you? Not 1989's "yippee, I've been inaugurated, now I can enact a gun import ban by executive order"?
Not 2003's "I'll sign an AWB renewal"?
How about 2015's "Our federal gun laws are just fine the way they are, but we need more gun grabs at the state level"? |
Comment by:
-none-
(9/18/2015)
|
pretty heavy handed "common sense reasonable" there, eh?
will divide families, will have to fully vet every member you have any contact with..or just say effit and limit/minimize/end all contact.
How many times has everyone at some point been "concerned about a family member" ?
more see something, say something, turn family into gestapo agents of the state...the masses suffer for a handful of mentally ill who actually manage to get stopped in time. There won't be any reflection upon the reporting family member, what motives are, just "will family member claim hold water before an obama judge" |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|