|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
LA: Governor’s veto of concealed carry increases likelihood of historic veto session
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The veto of the concealed carry bill on the heels of a veto to ban transgender females from competing in women’s sports has increased the likelihood of the first-ever veto session to be called.
Morris said he’s optimistic a session will be called and conceal carry will become law in Louisiana.
“We may make a little bit of history here, but we’ll have to see, I don’t know yet but I’m hopeful because I think a lot of the legislation that did get vetoed are things that the citizens of Louisiana really want,” said Morris.
The measure received wide support during the session it passed in the Senate on a 27-9 vote and in the House 73-28. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(6/26/2021)
|
I don't know how Louisiana NEVER had a veto override session before, EVER in its history, but ok. Did it just become a state? (kidding).
No news stories ever point out that this passed by veto proof 2/3 margins in both chambers. By 3 votes in the senate and by 6 votes in the house. "Journalists" nowadays are scared of math obviously. No wonder they all buy the big lie that Xiden somehow won the presidency.
Anyway, this doofus governor waits till literally the last minute to veto it? Why? Assessing the political damage to his lame duck self? So the sponsor tried reasoning with this democrud idiot (waste of time) and didn't ask him what OTHER parts of the bill of rights should require a license. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
