
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings Signs on With ‘Mayors Against Illegal Guns’
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings has taken up arms against illegal guns.
Rawlings said Monday that the decision to take on the issue was triggered by a discussions during a recent pow-wow of top U.S. law enforcement and city officials. The mayor, who has made domestic violence a hallmark issue, said he has officially signed on with Mayors Against Illegal Guns after he decided that he could take a “unifying” approach to firearms. |
Comment by:
lostone1413
(10/21/2015)
|
Bloomberg is showing how cheap it is to buy are politicians |
Comment by:
harp1034
(10/21/2015)
|
I live in Dallas. Take my word for it this guy is anti-gun. He does not speak for me. Dallas used to be a conservative town. But the white middle class moved way out beyond most of the suburbs. The left wingers control the City of Dallas and Dallas Co. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|