|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gun owners have a duty to stop this madness
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
We need more law-abiding responsible gun owners owning the Second Amendment and practicing it responsibly. We need to prevent monsters from having guns.
Start with age 21 to buy any gun.
It is currently legal for an 18-year-old boy to go to a store and buy an AR-15 if there is nothing negative in his background check.
The NICS system needs to be upgraded, improved and maintained with current data and sometimes a four-day delay becomes the standard wait.
If your life is in immediate danger and you need a gun today — borrow one from a law-abiding gun owner or stay in their dwelling. Go to a safe public place. Go stay in the lobby of a police station. |
| Comment by:
shootergdv
(9/7/2019)
|
| Many of those 18 year old "boys" can carry full autos in service of our country. My safe place is in my home - with an AR ! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
