|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/9/2016)
|
| The premise is BS and the author is a despicable propagandist. |
| Comment by:
PP9
(7/11/2016)
|
People are killed by police fairly often. Is the NRA required to speak out on each one before the facts have come in? I know that's what Obama and other leftists would do ("the police... acted stupidly...), but is that really the right idea?
The left is desperate to make sure the NRA is portrayed as intolerant haters of most everyone, as the recent shootings have had vulnerable populations (blacks, gays) interested in arming themselves for self-defense, in defiance of the orders of their political masters, who have told them that being defenseless makes us all safer.
The left MUST make every issue into a white male vs. everyone else contest, since they claim ownership of the "everyone else" group.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
