|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
NotPrey
(6/15/2016)
|
| It is obvious that Bill O'Reilly does not know anything about hunting rifles and the power of various cartridges. I am disappointed that Bill O'Reilly sunk to a mindless knee jerk emotional response about the so called "assault weapon" |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/15/2016)
|
Actually, the AR-15 platform is not a high powered rifle. It is a medium power rifle at best.
Anyone that believes restrictions on firearms will deter terrorists, criminals, and malcontents is living a fantasy. The terrorists in France had full automatic rifles and grenades in a county where all guns are tightly controlled. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/15/2016)
|
Everytime O'Reilly talks about what guns should be regulated, he says we ought not be able to buy bazooka and handgrenades.
*Sigh*
Bazooka are obsolete. And where can I buy grenades? I have never seen any of those....ever....being sold at gun shows or Gunstores.
Do they have "grenade shows?"
What am I missing? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
