|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NE: Second Amendment protects right
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose
The Supreme Court is the final word on what the Second Amendment says. Not the NRA, with its bumper sticker distortions, and certainly not our governor or some county commission. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/2/2021)
|
The author misses the point.
He is correct that the 2A was enshrined to insure that state militias could not be disarmed, but it didn't create the right nor limit it to the militia. It assumed the right as preexisting and endowed on the people by natural law, and it could not be infringed.
Scalia's Heller reference,
Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose
referred to "dangerous and unusual" weapons, not those in common use by the public.
The author's assertion that Scalia's opinion was incongruous with the NRA's view is pure nonsense. |
|
|
