|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(12/19/2018)
|
The Constitution is at the heart of a Governor taking the Oath Of Office. The People of America have never authorized their elected representatives to destroy their Bill of Rights.Why do the American people allow elected officials to break the oath of office (Which is a federal crime) and not hold them accountable? Law Enforcement is required to arrest those that willfully break laws. Deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution, or laws of the United States, is a Federal Crime.
|
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(12/19/2018)
|
| I’m waiting for the good Americans who have sworn the oath to, "Protect and Serve" our Constitution, to take that Oath seriously and act against the real enemies threatening us now. Deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution, or laws of the United States, is a Federal Crime.The People of America have never authorized their elected representatives to destroy the Bill of Rights. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/19/2018)
|
| Cuomo is STINK! Progressives are STINK! There can be no reasonable doubt about it, so WHY are so many idiot voters still electing them? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
