|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(7/16/2018)
|
He didn't "say no", he negotiated a "compromise" with them whereby his name and picture would be plastered all over the news, along with public knowledge that his house no longer had any guns in it.
The only thing he got out of compromising his rights is instead of giving his guns to the cops (who would probably not be interested in ever giving them back), he'd chose where they went when they left his control. |
| Comment by:
jac
(7/16/2018)
|
Anyone that values their freedom would move out of that communist state where one needs police permission to purchase a firearm and they keep records on the guns that you own.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|
